The spread is payment for risk, not a free lunch

Graduate · enrolled learners

This lesson opens with Optiver, 2007 (settled 2012).

What happened

Optiver was a proprietary trading firm and market maker, and in July 2008 the CFTC sued it, alleging that in at least 19 instances in March 2007 it had attempted to manipulate the settlement prices of NYMEX crude oil, heating oil, and gasoline futures, and in at least 5 had caused artificial prices, by a tactic called banging the close: building large positions in contracts priced at the day's settlement, then trading futures shortly before and during the closing period in a way meant to push that settlement in Optiver's favor. In April 2012 Optiver and three of its officers settled, neither admitting nor denying the allegations, with a 13 million dollar civil penalty and 1 million dollars of disgorgement, 14 million dollars in all, plus a two-year ban on Optiver US trading those contracts around the close and trading bans of two to eight years for the officers. A market maker's honest income is the spread it earns for standing ready to trade and bearing the inventory risk of doing so, which is real work for a real reward. Banging the close, as the CFTC described it, is an attempt to manufacture a profit beyond that, not by bearing risk but by moving the settlement price itself, and that is manipulation, not market making. On the CFTC's account the firm reached past the spread that its risk-taking legitimately earned and grabbed at a price it could push, and the settlement cost it a penalty, a trading restriction and a stain on the firm.

The decision point

A market maker's legitimate income is the spread it earns for providing liquidity and bearing inventory risk, and that spread is payment for real risk, not a free lunch, so an attempt to manufacture profit beyond it by moving the price itself is not clever market making but market manipulation. Optiver is the case: a market-making firm that the CFTC alleged had reached past the risk-based spread and tried to push settlement prices in its favor by banging the close settled for 14 million dollars and trading restrictions. The distinction is fundamental to the craft: earning the spread means quoting fairly and being compensated for the risk of the inventory you take on, while banging the close, or any tactic that moves the price to benefit your position rather than reflecting supply and demand, is taking a profit you did not earn by risk and the market did not freely give. The temptation is understandable, because a market maker sits close to the mechanics of price formation and can see how a well-timed order might nudge a settlement, but that proximity is exactly why the line matters: the same position at the market makes the manipulation both possible and illegal. So the discipline is to treat the spread as the whole of the legitimate reward, to earn it by bearing risk and quoting honestly, and to recognize that any profit sought by moving the price rather than by taking risk is manipulation that regulators pursue, because Optiver shows that reaching past the risk-based spread for a manufactured gain trades a real business for a penalty and a restriction.

Recorded loss

$14,000,000

Orientation and Year One are open: anyone can read them without an account. From Year Two onward the lessons are for enrolled learners, because progress through the later years only means anything if it is tracked against a record.

It is free. We do not sell the list and there is nothing to buy at the end of it.