Curriculum·G501 Market Making and Liquidity Provision·about 34 min
Making markets means carrying inventory risk
By the end of this lesson you can
- →Explain that a market maker holds inventory in order to earn a spread, and that inventory carries risk
- →Describe how Ronin Capital lost its clearing when March 2020 losses left it short of its capital requirements
- →Reason that a market maker's inventory risk is largest in the dislocations that make the spread attractive
- →Recognize that a market maker survives on capital and risk limits, not on the spread alone
Graduate · enrolled learners
This lesson opens with Ronin Capital, March 2020.
- What happened
- Ronin Capital was a proprietary trading firm, once the largest proprietary trading name in Chicago's futures markets and a direct clearing member of CME Clearing, holding a large book of positions, and in the extreme volatility of mid-March 2020 it took losses that left it, in the CME's words, unable to meet its capital requirements going forward. On March 20 CME Clearing auctioned off Ronin's portfolios to other firms, and the same day FICC, the clearinghouse for US Treasury trades, ceased to act for Ronin under its rules. Ronin had no customer business, so no customers were affected and the CME guaranty fund was untouched, and by August 2020 the firm was withdrawing the licenses it needed to trade. Making markets means holding inventory in order to earn the spread between the buy and sell price, which is comfortable in calm times but means being long or short exactly when prices gap violently, so the inventory that earns a spread in normal conditions becomes a large, mark-to-market loss in a crisis. Nothing was stolen and the CME alleged no wrongdoing; the firm simply held positions whose losses, in a historic dislocation, left it short of the capital a clearing member must keep. Ronin had traded through calm markets for years, and the same kind of book that earns in calm markets was the book that sank it when the market moved far and fast.
- The decision point
- A market maker earns its living by quoting a price to buy and a price to sell and capturing the spread between them, but doing so means continuously holding inventory, positions it did not choose for a view but accumulated by making markets, and that inventory carries real risk that is largest exactly when the market moves violently. Ronin Capital is the case: a trading firm whose March 2020 losses left it unable to meet its capital requirements had its portfolios auctioned off by CME Clearing and wound down, undone not by any alleged wrongdoing but by the losses on a book of inventory in an extraordinary dislocation. This is the first thing to understand about market making: the spread is not free money for standing in the middle; it is payment for taking on inventory and the risk of holding it, and that risk concentrates in the crises that also widen the spread and make the activity look most lucrative. So a market maker's survival does not rest on the spread it earns but on the capital and risk limits that let it hold and fund its inventory through a dislocation, because a firm whose inventory losses consume its capital when prices gap is finished regardless of how profitable its market making looked the week before. The discipline, for anyone providing liquidity or relying on those who do, is to see market making as a risk business first and a spread business second, to size inventory to the capital available in a crisis rather than the profit available in calm, and to remember that Ronin traded for years and still did not survive the week its losses outran its capital.
What you will be able to answer
- →What happened to Ronin Capital in March 2020?
- →How does a market maker earn its living, and what does that require?
- →When is a market maker's inventory risk largest?
- →What does a market maker's survival rest on?
Orientation and Year One are open: anyone can read them without an account. From Year Two onward the lessons are for enrolled learners, because progress through the later years only means anything if it is tracked against a record.
It is free. We do not sell the list and there is nothing to buy at the end of it.
Sources and review
- https://www.cmegroup.com/media-room/press-releases/2020/3/20/cme_group_statementonroninllc.html
- https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1156375/000119312520083311/d885506d8k.htm
- https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/20/clearing-firm-ronin-capital-unable-to-meet-capital-requirements-at-cme-sources.html
- https://www.risk.net/risk-management/7535981/the-mysterious-disappearance-of-a-chicago-trading-giant
- https://www.risk.net/risk-management/7672111/ronin-felled-prop-giant-shuts-up-shop
Confidence high·Volatility medium·Reviewed 2026-09-18·Owner unassigned
Contested
The loss is recorded as 0 because no figure for Ronin's losses has been published. The CME's statement says only that the firm was unable to meet its capital requirements going forward; its 8-K adds that the guaranty fund was untouched and that any remaining margin, after costs, would be returned to Ronin, so the failure was of capital, not of posted margin. Risk.net reported in April 2020 that the source of the losses and the results of the auction remained unknown. The lesson uses the inventory-risk mechanism, not a precise figure.
The CME's statement does not use the word default; the default-style action was the DTCC's, whose Treasury clearinghouse FICC ceased to act for Ronin on March 20, 2020. The positions behind the losses were never publicly confirmed (CNBC, citing unnamed sources, tied them to futures on the CBOE Volatility Index), so reading them as the inventory risk of a large trading book in a violent week is this lesson's interpretation, not a finding of the CME; the durable point, that a book's inventory can lose more than a firm's capital in a violent move, holds regardless of the exact positions.
