Curriculum·G703 Disclosure Ethics and How Crypto Educators Get Compromised·about 31 min

The disclosure rule you will actually follow

By the end of this lesson you can

→State what the court found in the Sparkster case about the influencer's role, and what the compensation was that went undisclosed
→Explain why a disclosure rule written as a principle fails at the moment it is needed, and what a rule with a number and a place in it does instead
→Compute what the 30 percent bonus was worth against a stated allocation, and why a bonus in tokens is the form of compensation most often left undisclosed
→Write your own disclosure rule: what triggers it, what it says, where it appears, and what you do when a sponsor objects

Graduate · enrolled learners

This lesson opens with SEC v. Ian Balina, partial summary judgment, 22 May 2024.

What happened: The Commission had charged Ian Balina, a crypto influencer, with promoting SPRK tokens issued by Sparkster on YouTube, Telegram and other platforms between May and July 2018 without disclosing that Sparkster had given him a 30 percent bonus on the tokens he bought as compensation for his promotion, and with conducting an unregistered offering by organizing an investing pool that distributed the tokens. On 22 May 2024 the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas granted partial summary judgment to the Commission, holding that SPRK tokens were offered and sold as securities under the Howey test and that Balina had acted as an underwriter by buying tokens with intent to distribute them to a pool he controlled, so the unregistered-offering claim was established as a matter of law. The court denied Balina's motion on the anti-touting claim, which survived for trial.
The decision point: The compensation was not a check. It was a bonus, paid in the tokens he was already buying, and it is the form of payment most often left undisclosed because it does not feel like being paid; it feels like getting a good price. The influencer had an audience, a pool and a presence on three platforms, and no rule that said what to disclose, when, and where. A rule written as a principle, be transparent, disclose conflicts, fails at exactly this point, because the principle does not say whether a bonus counts, and the person deciding is the person who wants it not to. A rule that works has a trigger, a text, a place and a response to objection, and it is written before the offer arrives.

What you will be able to answer

→What was the Sparkster case about?
→Why is a bonus in tokens the compensation most often left undisclosed?
→Why does a principle fail as a disclosure rule?
→The four parts of a rule that works?

Orientation and Year One are open: anyone can read them without an account. From Year Two onward the lessons are for enrolled learners, because progress through the later years only means anything if it is tracked against a record.

It is free. We do not sell the list and there is nothing to buy at the end of it.

Enroll, it is free Sign in Start at the beginning

Sources and review

Confidence high·Volatility medium·Reviewed 2026-09-14·Owner unassigned

Contested

The anti-touting claim was not decided by the May 2024 ruling and the case's later procedural history, including reports in 2025 that the Commission moved to dismiss, is not relied on here. The lesson uses the undisclosed bonus as the alleged fact pattern and the registration holding as the decided one.

The 30 percent figure is the Commission's allegation as stated in its litigation release. Balina contested the characterization of his role throughout.

← The educator who became the funnel