AML on a stablecoin the world can hold

Graduate · enrolled learners

This lesson opens with Liberty Reserve, May 2013.

What happened

Liberty Reserve was a centralized digital currency, based in Costa Rica, that let people hold and transfer dollar- and euro-denominated value online. By design it required almost no identity verification, users could open accounts with fictitious details, and transfers were structured to obscure who was paying whom, which made it ideal for one thing: moving criminal proceeds. It grew to around a million users and processed tens of millions of transactions, and US prosecutors described it as a hub that laundered an estimated 6 billion dollars in criminal proceeds, calling it one of the largest money-laundering cases they had brought. In May 2013 the US and international partners shut it down and indicted its operators; its founder later pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 20 years. Liberty Reserve was not a stablecoin, but it was the thing a payment token becomes when it is widely held, freely transferable, and has no anti-money-laundering controls: a global laundering machine, at the scale its reach allowed.

The decision point

A stablecoin the world can hold is a payment instrument that is transferable, borderless, and potentially held by millions, and those very properties, the ones that make it useful, make the absence of anti-money-laundering controls catastrophic rather than merely risky. A small, obscure payment system with no AML is a problem; a widely-held, freely transferable one is a systemic laundering channel, because its scale and reach let it move criminal proceeds at a volume a small operator never could. Liberty Reserve is the demonstration: a centralized digital currency with no meaningful identity verification, built for anonymous transfer, laundered an estimated 6 billion dollars precisely because it was large and easy to use. This is why a stablecoin regime like the GENIUS Act attaches anti-money-laundering obligations to the issuer, know-your-customer, monitoring, suspicious-activity reporting, sanctions screening, as a condition of issuing at all: a bearer-like instrument at global scale requires AML at the issuer or it becomes exactly what Liberty Reserve was. So the decision when building or relying on a widely-held stablecoin is to treat AML not as a feature that can be added later but as a precondition of scale, because the same reach that makes the instrument valuable is what turns missing AML into a systemic channel for laundering, and the bigger and more usable the stablecoin, the more true that is.

Recorded loss

$6,000,000,000

Orientation and Year One are open: anyone can read them without an account. From Year Two onward the lessons are for enrolled learners, because progress through the later years only means anything if it is tracked against a record.

It is free. We do not sell the list and there is nothing to buy at the end of it.