Curriculum·G504 The Rogue Trader and the Control Failure·about 33 min

Segregation of duties, and why it exists

By the end of this lesson you can

  • Explain that segregation of duties keeps the people who trade separate from those who confirm and record
  • Describe how Adoboli used back-office knowledge to hide unauthorized positions with fictitious hedges
  • Reason that whoever controls both trading and its verification can hide anything
  • Recognize segregation of duties as a structural control, not a bureaucratic formality

Graduate · enrolled learners

This lesson opens with UBS and Kweku Adoboli, 2011.

What happened
Kweku Adoboli was a trader at UBS who had moved to the trading desk from the bank's back office, the part of the firm that confirms, settles, and records trades. From the desk he ran unauthorized positions far beyond his limits and hid them by entering fictitious hedges and using forward-settling trades whose confirmation could be delayed, so his book looked balanced and the real risk stayed off the reports until it could no longer be concealed, at which point the loss was about 2.3 billion dollars. His back-office experience was the key: he knew how trades were verified and recorded, so he knew how to make an unreal trade look real to the systems that were supposed to catch it. The controls existed, but they relied on the trading side and the verification side being genuinely separate, and Adoboli understood both sides well enough to make them agree with a lie. The loss was not that one control was missing; it was that one person effectively spanned the trade and its verification, and a person who controls both can hide anything.
The decision point
Segregation of duties, keeping the people who trade separate from the people who confirm, settle, and record those trades, exists precisely because anyone who controls both the trade and its verification can make a fake trade look real, so it is a structural control and not a bureaucratic formality, and its erosion is how hidden positions survive. UBS and Adoboli are the case: a trader who had come from the back office, and who therefore understood how trades were verified and recorded, hid unauthorized positions with fictitious hedges and delayed confirmations, and the bank lost about 2.3 billion dollars because the trade and its verification were not, in effect, in different hands. The principle is old and simple: the person who does a thing must not also be the person who checks it, because if they are, the check is worthless, it will always agree with them. In trading, that means the desk that enters a trade must not control the function that confirms it exists with the counterparty and records it, so that a trade the desk invents cannot pass the check. Adoboli did not defeat a strong control; he stood, through his knowledge and access, on both sides of the check, and a check with the same person on both sides confirms whatever that person wants. So the discipline is to treat segregation of duties as load-bearing, to ensure genuine independence between trading and its verification in fact and not just on an org chart, and to be especially alert where someone has the knowledge or access to span both, because the moment the doer and the checker are the same, the most important control a trading operation has quietly stops working, and UBS is what that costs.
Recorded loss
$2,300,000,000

What you will be able to answer

  • How did Adoboli hide his positions at UBS (2011)?
  • What does segregation of duties keep separate, and why?
  • Why can whoever controls both trading and verification hide anything?
  • Why is segregation of duties on the org chart not enough?

Orientation and Year One are open: anyone can read them without an account. From Year Two onward the lessons are for enrolled learners, because progress through the later years only means anything if it is tracked against a record.

It is free. We do not sell the list and there is nothing to buy at the end of it.

Terms used here

Sources and review

Confidence high·Volatility low·Reviewed 2026-09-18·Owner unassigned

Contested

The about 2.3 billion dollar figure is the widely-reported loss UBS attributed to the unauthorized trading; the exact amount and the split of blame between the trader and the bank's controls were examined in the criminal case and regulatory findings. The lesson uses the segregation-of-duties mechanism, not a precise figure.

Adoboli argued the bank's culture tacitly tolerated limit-breaking; regardless of that dispute, the durable point, that a control fails when the doer and the checker are effectively the same person, holds.