Curriculum·G103 Fund-Flow Tracing and Forensics·about 31 min

Through a mixer, and the peel chain

By the end of this lesson you can

  • →Recognize a peel chain: a large sum shedding small amounts through a long chain of addresses
  • →Explain how PlusToken's operators laundered billions through peel chains and mixers
  • →Compute how a peel chain hides a destination in noise without breaking the recorded trail
  • →Follow value through obfuscation by tracking the large residual and the peeled amounts separately

Graduate · enrolled learners

This lesson opens with PlusToken Ponzi, 2019.

What happened
PlusToken was one of the largest cryptocurrency Ponzi schemes: based in China, it presented itself as a wallet paying high returns and took in from millions of people what Chainalysis tracked as 180,000 BTC, 6.4 million ETH and smaller sums, roughly 2 billion dollars, before six people connected to it were arrested in June 2019. The operators then had to launder an enormous sum on transparent chains, and they used two standard tools. Mixers pooled and re-emitted funds to break the direct trail. Peel chains did the quieter work: a large mother amount would move to a new address, peeling off a small slice to an exchange or cash-out point, then move the large remainder to another new address and peel again, so the funds trickled out in small, individually unremarkable amounts while the bulk kept moving. By December 2019 the scammers had moved their bitcoin more than 24,000 times through more than 71,000 addresses. Chainalysis tracked much of it regardless: 45,000 BTC and about 800,000 ETH it could say the scammers moved to their own addresses, roughly 25,000 of that BTC already cashed out, nearly all through OTC brokers operating on the Huobi exchange, at least 185 million dollars of it. The laundering added enormous noise and did not erase the recorded path.
The decision point
A peel chain is designed to exploit an analyst's attention, not to break the ledger. Every peel and every move is a recorded edge, so the trail is fully intact; what the technique adds is volume, thousands of hops and thousands of tiny outputs, betting that a tracer will lose the thread or run out of patience. The counter is structural: at each peel, the funds split into a small peeled amount and a large residual, and the residual is the thing to follow, because it carries the bulk and continues the chain, while the peels are catalogued separately as cash-out attempts to be checked against known services. Mixers are the harder wall, handled by the correspondence methods of clustering, but a peel chain is not a wall at all; it is a long, noisy corridor whose every step is written down. Following money through obfuscation is mostly discipline: know which technique you are looking at, and know the one thread that carries the value.
Recorded loss
$2,000,000,000

What you will be able to answer

  • →What is a peel chain?
  • →How did PlusToken launder its ~2 billion dollars?
  • →What does a peel chain break, and what does it not?
  • →How do you trace through a peel chain?

Orientation and Year One are open: anyone can read them without an account. From Year Two onward the lessons are for enrolled learners, because progress through the later years only means anything if it is tracked against a record.

It is free. We do not sell the list and there is nothing to buy at the end of it.

Sources and review

Confidence high·Volatility low·Reviewed 2026-09-15·Owner unassigned

Contested

PlusToken's total intake depends on the source: Chainalysis tracked roughly 2 billion dollars sent by victims to PlusToken wallets, while Chinese media reported over 3 billion dollars; some of the inflow was paid out to early investors. Chainalysis documents both mixers (Wasabi Wallet's CoinJoin) and peel chains in the laundering, and its 2020 update says the scammers had sent roughly 23,000 more BTC to exchanges by March 2020, increasingly to OKEx as well as Huobi.

Peel-chain and mixer techniques vary in implementation; the residual-following method described is the standard counter and does not guarantee following every peel to a named identity.