Curriculum·G101 Querying On-Chain Data·about 30 min
What the chain records, and the run FTX could not hide
By the end of this lesson you can
- →State what a public blockchain records and what it does not, and why that makes it evidence
- →Explain how FTX's concentrated reserves and withdrawal run were readable on-chain before the bankruptcy
- →Compute a reserve concentration from public balances and say what it does and does not prove
- →Decide which questions the chain can answer and which need off-chain information
Graduate · enrolled learners
This lesson opens with FTX and Alameda Research, November 2022.
- What happened
- FTX was one of the largest cryptocurrency exchanges, tightly linked to the trading firm Alameda Research. On 2 November 2022 a leaked Alameda balance sheet showed its assets were dominated by FTT, a token FTX itself had issued, rather than independent assets. On-chain analysts then read the public wallets directly: FTX's exchange reserves were heavily concentrated in that same self-issued token, and as confidence broke, a visible outflow of customer assets accelerated into a run over 6 to 8 November. The exchange said it was fine. On 11 November it filed for bankruptcy with an estimated 8 billion dollar hole between what customers were owed and what remained. The addresses, balances and transfers were public the entire time; the collapse was off-chain, but its shadow was on-chain and readable days early.
- The decision point
- The people who read FTX's wallets in early November were not insiders and had no leak beyond the balance sheet that started it. They had a skill: they could ask the public chain what FTX actually held and what was actually moving, and the answers, concentrated reserves and an accelerating outflow, contradicted the company's reassurances days before the filing. This is the analyst's first and most important fact. A public blockchain is an immutable record of what moved, held by no one and readable by anyone, so it is evidence in a way a company's statement is not. It does not show intentions, off-chain debts, or private ledgers, and confusing what it does show for the whole truth is its own error. But what it shows, it shows to everyone equally, and learning to ask it is where analysis begins.
- Recorded loss
- $8,000,000,000
What you will be able to answer
- →What did analysts read in FTX's wallets before the collapse?
- →Why is a public blockchain evidence?
- →What can the chain not tell you?
- →What edge did the FTX analysts have?
Orientation and Year One are open: anyone can read them without an account. From Year Two onward the lessons are for enrolled learners, because progress through the later years only means anything if it is tracked against a record.
It is free. We do not sell the list and there is nothing to buy at the end of it.
Sources and review
- https://www.nansen.ai/research/the-ftx-implosion-what-happened-and-what-we-can-learn
- https://www.investopedia.com/what-went-wrong-with-ftx-6828447
- https://rekt.news/ftx-rekt/
Confidence high·Volatility medium·Reviewed 2026-09-15·Owner unassigned
Contested
The FTX shortfall is commonly cited around 8 billion dollars; exact figures shifted through the bankruptcy proceedings and asset recoveries. The on-chain readability of FTX's concentrated FTT reserves and the withdrawal outflow is documented by multiple analytics firms.
This lesson uses FTX for the point that on-chain data is public evidence readable before an off-chain collapse is confirmed; it does not claim the chain alone proved insolvency, which also depended on off-chain liabilities.
